LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CENTRALCAL Archives




Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave CENTRALCAL
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Fwd: Sac Bee Editorial
From: Jose Martinez-Saldana <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Jose Martinez-Saldana <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:35:42 -0800

text/plain (126 lines)


Jose Martinez-Saldana,
Director of Early Outreach and Support Programs
California State University, Monterey Bay
100 Campus Center / 86B
Seaside, CA  93955-8001
Telephone:  (831) 582-4600 xt. 3657
Fax:  (831) 582-3663
Email:  [log in to unmask]

>>This story is taken from Peter Schrag at
>>Peter Schrag: On higher ed: The governor's march to the rear
>>By Peter Schrag -- Bee Columnist - (Published March 24, 2004)
>>As students march in protest and university trustees talk policy, the
>>biggest shadow cast by California's higher education budget cuts and fee
>>increases isn't the immediate hardships for students and their colleges,
>>but the state's lack of direction and vision.
>>The most significant element in that budget is Gov. Arnold
>>Schwarzenegger's decision to put a greater share of the pain on the
>>state's four-year universities than on the community colleges - to
>>emphasize access over research and high-end quality.
>>Under the state's fiscal circumstances, that may not be an unreasonable
>>decision. The community colleges have gotten the short end of the stick
>>for years. But it also has left a lot of academics wondering whether the
>>governor really understands the invaluable asset that the state's higher
>>education system represents. And since Schwarzenegger wants to raise
>>graduate student fees by some 40 percent, he's also jeopardizing one of
>>the state's highest priorities - the effort to attract better people
>>teaching. Making them pay 40 percent more is hardly a come-on.
>>The decision to favor access is an obvious departure from those of prior
>>administrations, which almost invariably favored the politically
>>influential University of California over the much larger but otherwise
>>politically weak two-year colleges. But if the switch signals anything
>>more than the administration's short-term belief that it can get more
>>for its buck in the community colleges, no one is saying.
>>In the "exceptional bind" that the state finds itself, said Assistant
>>Secretary for Higher Education Anne McKinney, the immediate task "is
>>enrollment management." And as last week's fee debates at the separate
>>meetings of the UC regents and trustees of the California State
>>made clear, the administration is glad to leave as much of that hot
>>in other people's hands.
>>But since the governor's car tax cut added $4 billion to the
>>bind," since his budget doesn't increase access anywhere and since it
>>hamstrings the options of the state's colleges and universities, the
>>situation would be truly frightening if it were anything but an ad hoc
>>Even before Schwarzenegger was elected last fall, budget cuts - fee
>>increases, reduced space in courses, the spill-over from UC and CSU -
>>already reduced access in the community colleges so much that an
>>175,000 students had been driven out of the system.
>>The governor is correct that his proposed community college fee
>>- from $18 to $26 per unit ($780 per year for a full load) - will enable
>>students to qualify for the maximum federal Pell Grant (of $4,000 a
>>thereby ending the state's inadvertent subsidy to the federal program.
>>He's also right that even with the proposed increases, California
>>community college students will still be paying less than 40 percent of
>>what the average American community college student pays, and that most
>>California's university students, graduate and undergraduate, still pay
>>considerably less than the average in other U.S. public universities.
>>But in the very act of citing those comparisons, Schwarzenegger raises
>>fundamental questions about the direction in which he proposes to go. A
>>growing number of major public universities - Michigan and Virginia
>>particularly - have been sent well down the road toward privatization,
>>where taxpayers bear an ever-shrinking part of the cost, and tuition,
>>grants and revenues from various big-bucks entrepreneurial programs pay
>>the difference. Is that the way California is headed?
>>It's not clear that anyone in Schwarzenegger's shop has yet confronted
>>such questions. The governor likes to talk about the wonderful
>>opportunities California offered when he first arrived here as an
>>immigrant in 1968 - the period of the great expansion of California's
>>universities, when college attendance was virtually free.
>>But as so many of those UC professors now ask: Does he understand how
>>the quality of those institutions - the research they perform, the
>>they draw, the possibilities they offer - contribute both to
>>business climate and its quality of life? It's premature to say that the
>>promise of the state's 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education has been
>>broken. The master plan guarantees UC admission to the top 12.5 percent
>>the state's high school graduates and CSU admission to the top third,
>>it also makes the two-year colleges the gateways to the universities. If
>>Schwarzenegger's proposal to shift more of the instructional load in the
>>first two years to the community colleges increases the number of
>>transfers to the four-year colleges, it might actually help revitalize
>>that promise.
>>But until there are decent data, there's no way to know. It's that
>>ignorance about the condition of the system - and California's broader
>>indifference to planning and serious thought about its future - that's
>>potentially damaging.
>>A great many of the cuts and shifts and fudges in California's higher
>>education budget might be defensible if there were a longer term vision.
>>Schwarzenegger came to office promising to be a leader, but so far his
>>clearest call has been for a resolute march to the rear.
>>About the Writer
>>Peter Schrag can be reached at Box 15779, Sacramento, CA 95852-0779 or
>>[log in to unmask] Back columns:

This message has been scanned for viruses, worms, and potentially
dangerous attachments and is believed to be safe. We do not recommend
opening attachments unless you are expecting them. To learn more about
virus protection at CSUMB, visit:

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main CENTRALCAL Page



Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager